It’s crazy that the beans that go into making these two beautiful life-forces can produce such delicious flavors. Well according to some knowledgeable Redditors, once upon a time, some goat herders saw that their goats were eating coffee beans and getting all crazy. They, too, wanted to get all hyped up, so they tried the beans. And they had already discovered that roasting things made for better flavors. We now have chocolate and dark chocolate and chocolates filled with nuts and creams and coffee and frappes and cold-brew coffee. According to this thread, the real reason is unknown. Was this rule made up, causing us to falsely believe that our MP3 players or Kindles would blow up the plane?
Maybe I am ignorant and dont’t understand ITT well enough, then I will appreciate if you explain me where I am wrong. Of course we still need some mathematical models of qualia. For example we need to explain why RGB input of an eye gives us such explain like im 5 distinct colours like yellow, magenta, cyan, black, white. Why don’t I perceive yellow as a greenish red or redish green? Maybe it’s a deal of cultural influennce, I don’t know. English speakers tend to mix cyan and blue into one category.
Some time within the first few weeks of class, he points out that I’m “the only spook” in the class. So, I doubt it will surprise you I was relieved when he took medical leave after suffering a heart attack and was replaced by a sub for the rest of the semester. The point here is,if you’ve never been ‘the only one’ of your race in a class, at a party, on a job, etc. and/or it’s been pointed out in a “playful” fashion by the explain like im 5 authority figure in said situation, you have white privilege. So that I may be enlightened, can you please share with me some examples of institutional racism that have made an indelible mark upon you? If I am to understand this, I need people I know personally to show me how I’m missing what’s going on. I’m not trying to be insensitive, I only want to understand . I apologize if this comes off as crass or offends anyone.
IIT gives us an ingenious idea to consider causal relations to be such glue. And it seems indeed promising since causality really exists, otherwise physics wouldn’t work. The problem that I see in IIT is that it relies on such notions as computing element, logical state, moment.
One might imagine an accountant explaining his changing needs to a software engineer. In one situation, the person requesting the explanation does not fully understand the concept or situation being discussed, and is requesting a basic explanation that uses simpler terms. The explanation will explain like im 5 probably include a number of oversimplified analogies. In this scenario the person asking might not have a personal relation at all to the subject matter; however, academics and professionals from nearly related fields may use this phrase to indicate some interest in their colleagues’ work.
Counting 16,5 million subscribers, its members ask questions about complex subjects, ranging from physics to sociology, with the goal of getting an explanation that’s understandable without having the appropriate domain knowledge. It is incredibly challenging to converse with a child in this phase, because it forces you to simplify complex ideas into small words and sentences. An adult will automatically do this without ever reading anything written by Piaget , it’s pretty much a reflex.
Interestingly, the urge to make an effort to explain “why” things are the way they are in a simple manner often disappears as soon as we switch out the child for an adult. Anyone who has ever interacted with a child between 3 and 5 years old for an extensive period of time will have had the stream of “Why? Even though the motivation of the child isn’t always to get a fitting answer, it is often used to typify the relentless curiosity of children in general. Listen if you like – they seem like nice enough guys. But I wouldn’t go quoting any of this “information” to other people because you may end up fairly embarrassed. Made possible by the amazing reddit community at r/explainlikeimfive. See episode show notes for user credits.
When my older sister was 5, a white boy named Mark called her a “nigger” after she beat him in a race at school. She didn’t know what it meant, but in her gut she knew it was bad. This was the first time I’d seen my father the kind of angry that has nowhere to go. If it’s unclear in any way, the point here isif you’ve never had a defining moment in your childhood or your life where you realize your skin color alone makes other people hate you, you have white privilege. First off, I hope you don’t mind that I’ve quoted your post and made it part of mine.
My white friend asked me to explain white privilege, so I decided to be honest. The process is similar to making icing flowers for cakes. More complex processes are comparable to making churros, where the dough is explain like im 5 piped into hot oil, fried, and then coated with sugar and cinnamon. Similarly, in a more difficult 3d printing process the material is shaped and then treated either through the introduction of light or high heat.
It really is so nice that we have all of these luxuries and all of these options before us. And we don’t even have to leave our couches to order some of them! And it really is crazy to think that early humans went through some crazy trail-and-error situations just to figure out what we could eat, what hurt people, what worked well with what, and which plants tasted super good. Vanilla extract is bitter, but how about raw chocolate and coffee?
I find that a few clarifying questions can confirm my suspicions in short order. Whilst someone using this might mean that they really don’t understand, it is also possible that the person asking suspects that the person explaining doesn’t really understand either and is only parroting jargon. @user +1 for “stop them from using jargon or making assumptions about what you ‘should’ already know”. These are big problems I face in my job. Often people try to use jargon to sound “smarter” but _mis_use it, and cause communications problems. Others describe things with acronyms and nicknames that may make perfect sense to them, but mean nothing to me.
6.In my freshman college tutorial, our small group of 4–5 was assigned to read Thoreau, Emerson, Malcolm X, Joseph Conrad, Dreiser, etc. When it was the week to discuss The Autobiography of Malcolm X, one white boy boldly claimed he couldn’t even get through it because he couldn’t relate and didn’t think he should be forced to read it.
I don’t remember the words I said, but I still remember the feeling—I think it’s what doctors refer to as chandelier pain—as soon as a sensitive area on a patient is touched, they shoot through the roof—that’s what I felt. I know I said something like my whole life I’ve had to read “things that don’t have anything to do with explain like im 5 me or that I relate to” but I find a way anyway because that’s what learning is about—trying to understand other people’s perspectives. The point here is—the canon of literature studied in the United States, as well as the majority of television and movies, have focused primarily on the works or achievements of white men.
While the group has been geared for adult readers, it has now morphed into a video series featuring real 5-year-olds. “Explain explain like im 5 like i’m five” simply means that the explanation should be elaborate at the same time very easy to understand.